Category Archives: technology

Allocate Your Attention to Timeless Information

Never before in human history has the average person had access to such vast amounts of information, creating the capacity to learn anything about any topic they put their time and attention to. Yet, at the same time, the average person seems to be as dumb as ever—because they are not putting their time and attention to the proper information.

On the internet you can read the greatest books ever written for free in the public domain, but most people choose to watch ephemeral video clips on TikTok. Even among those who read, they choose to read short posts on Twitter/X, Bluesky, Threads, Facebook, and Instagram. Social media posts are often not well written, just a spur-of-the-moment stream of consciousness outrage-fueled rants and insults. Of course, there are still diamonds in the rough of social media to be found. But the problem with social media, as Marshall McLuhan would say, is the medium itself, more so than the content.

Continue reading

The AI Art Crown in the Slop Gutter

I don’t know how people can so brazenly dismiss AI art (for writing, music, images, and videos) when no one even fully knows the capacity of current models, let alone future ones. They say AI is not that good at X (be it writing fiction or making movies), when it is impossible for anyone to have fully explored the potential of AI at doing X. And that potential is growing by the day as each new LLM model is released.

Continue reading

Why Writers Hate AI (From a Writer Who Doesn’t)

The anti-AI sentiment within the writing community is rabid. Many writers say that all AI writing is slop, and you should never use it. But I think that’s mostly denial and cope. LLMs are getting better by the day, and while I still mostly stand by this piece about the limits of ChatGPT at writing fiction, AI (Claude in particular) has gotten orders of magnitude better at writing fiction over the two and a half years since I wrote that—and it will only get better in the future. If you think AI cannot contribute to good writing, you’re not trying hard enough (or prompting well enough).

Continue reading

Growing Up With the Internet as a Millennial vs Gen-Z

I recently listened to a podcast with Zoomers talking about their experience of growing up with the internet as they came of age. It made me realize how different things were for my generation, the Millennials. Your “coming of age” years are when you transition from childhood into adulthood, roughly from middle school through high school and college. Those years are enormously influential on your development, as the core experiences during that period influence the type of person you will ultimately become for the rest of your life. I came of age during the 1990s and early 2000s, whereas Gen-Z came of age in the 2010s and early 2020s. The year 2005 does not seem that long ago, but in many ways the world then is unrecognizable to the world young people face today—at least online.

Continue reading

Are We in an AI Bubble?

It seems fairly obvious at this point that AI is going to have a massive impact on the future. I wrote about this seven years ago, and it has only become more evident since then.1 However, financial “experts” are saying the stock market is in the midst of an AI bubble akin to the dot-com bubble of the early 2000s. They think AI companies are overvalued and advise selling off your AI investments. But the lesson from the dot-com bubble was not to NOT invest in internet companies. It was quite the opposite.

Continue reading

90s AIM vs Current Social Media

In the late 1990s, AOL instant messenger (AIM) was the first social network I used, and it is still my favorite form of social media. What was different about AIM is that it was more social, whereas modern social media is more parasocial.

Continue reading

The Bright Side of Deepfakes

AI is continually getting better at creating “deepfakes” of real people. A deepfake is an AI-generated image or video that depicts real people saying and doing things they did not actually do. Such deepfakes have fooled viewers into believing the scenes depicted to be real. Many are understandably alarmed about these developments in AI and fear the implications for the future—the political chaos and societal upheaval deepfakes may cause. While such negative outcomes are a worrisome threat, there is an upside to deepfakes as well.

Continue reading

Human Creativity Beats AI in the Future

In the future, only creative people will survive. There will be no jobs. Even art could be better done by robots and AI. But humans can still be creative. And they can find purpose in creating art or music or businesses or hobbies. Anyone who is not creative will essentially be a human robot (but a less productive version of the actual robots).

Continue reading

When AI Creates “Perfect” Art for You

In the future, it may be possible for AI to create art (including books, movies, music, and videogames) that is so perfectly attuned to an individual’s preferences, perhaps even directly using brain scans to determine the precise ingredients that will give the person the ultimate entertainment experience (like from David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest), whatever that may be for the particular individual. This AI would essentially create better art than humans—not that it would be objectively better than anything created by humans, but it would be subjectively better to that one particular human for whom the artwork is specifically created for. And AI could conceivably do this for every single human in the world: create unique works of art tailored to be the best work of art for that individual (whatever the criteria for “best” is for them). How could human artists compete with that?

Continue reading

Blake Crouch’s Upgrade and the Recursion of Pandora’s Box

I have a love/hate relationship with Blake Crouch’s books. He has fantastic premises about cutting-edge science and writes fast-paced thrillers that keep you eagerly turning the pages to the end. Crouch has been compared to Michael Crichton, in that they both write grounded techno-thrillers about plausible future technology with high-concept books that are ripe for adaptation to the screen (TV and movies). But despite me loving the premises of Crouch’s two previous books, Upgrade and Recursion, ultimately I didn’t like the books as a whole—or more precisely I was let down by their endings.

Continue reading