Indie Publishing is Free Market Publishing

Leave a reply

Professional publishing is fiat publishing, while indie publishing is free market publishing. The professional publishing industry, which consists of the “Big 5” book publishers (Penguin Random House, HarperCollins, Macmillan, Hachette Book Group, and Simon & Schuster) and literary agencies, are like central banks in the economy: they manipulate the market and create artificial scarcity by limiting which authors and books can be published. Indie publishing (self-publishing and small independent presses) is the free market for books, as it has a more natural flow of supply and demand. Everyone has the same opportunity, and success is more closely correlated with merit—or how much readers actually enjoy a book.

Continue reading →

90s AIM vs Current Social Media

Leave a reply

In the late 1990s, AOL instant messenger (AIM) was the first social network I used, and it is still my favorite form of social media. What was different about AIM is that it was more social, whereas modern social media is more parasocial.

Continue reading →

The Bright Side of Deepfakes

Leave a reply

AI is continually getting better at creating “deepfakes” of real people. A deepfake is an AI-generated image or video that depicts real people saying and doing things they did not actually do. Such deepfakes have fooled viewers into believing the scenes depicted to be real. Many are understandably alarmed about these developments in AI and fear the implications for the future—the political chaos and societal upheaval deepfakes may cause. While such negative outcomes are a worrisome threat, there is an upside to deepfakes as well.

Continue reading →

The Government as a Pizza

Leave a reply

The US government is like a pizza that everyone agrees tastes terrible. The Democrats and Republicans in Congress argue over whether to add rainbow sprinkles or chocolate sprinkles to make it taste better. Libertarians1 insist neither will make it taste better—sprinkles shouldn’t even be on a pizza. Besides, you’ve got all these other toppings on it already, which don’t go together at all: marshmallows, licorice, mayonnaise, and jelly. But the real problem is the dough is stale and the cheese is rotten. Besides, there are healthier things to be eating than pizza.

Continue reading →

The Art of Storytelling and Developing Your Voice as a Writer

Leave a reply

Storytelling is the key to good fiction. What is storytelling? It is the way you tell a story. A story is not merely a plot plus characters. If you give ten writers the same plot and characters, you will end up with ten wildly different stories (of varying levels of quality). That is where the talent of storytelling enters the equation. You can have a compelling plot and interesting characters, but if you don’t have a skilled storyteller to deliver those elements you’re not going to have a good story. It is not just a matter of being able to compose grammatically clean prose—ChatGPT can do that. Good storytelling is composing the story, from sentence to sentence, in a compelling way.

Continue reading →

Human Creativity Beats AI in the Future

Leave a reply

In the future, only creative people will survive. There will be no jobs. Even art could be better done by robots and AI. But humans can still be creative. And they can find purpose in creating art or music or businesses or hobbies. Anyone who is not creative will essentially be a human robot (but a less productive version of the actual robots).

Continue reading →

When AI Creates “Perfect” Art for You

Leave a reply

In the future, it may be possible for AI to create art (including books, movies, music, and videogames) that is so perfectly attuned to an individual’s preferences, perhaps even directly using brain scans to determine the precise ingredients that will give the person the ultimate entertainment experience (like from David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest), whatever that may be for the particular individual. This AI would essentially create better art than humans—not that it would be objectively better than anything created by humans, but it would be subjectively better to that one particular human for whom the artwork is specifically created for. And AI could conceivably do this for every single human in the world: create unique works of art tailored to be the best work of art for that individual (whatever the criteria for “best” is for them). How could human artists compete with that?

Continue reading →

What Will Aliens Look Like?

Leave a reply

When people speculate about what alien life forms might look like, most experts think it is extremely unlikely that they will be anything like humans. Neil deGrasse Tyson has critiqued Star Trek for its “lack of imagination” by making all their alien species somewhat humanoid in form with only slight cosmetic differences (although that was probably more due to lack of finances rather than lack of imagination). Regardless, I think experts like NDT are wrong. Intelligent aliens, if they exist, will probably look somewhat similar to humans, as Star Trek portrayed.

Continue reading →

Blake Crouch’s Upgrade and the Recursion of Pandora’s Box

Leave a reply

I have a love/hate relationship with Blake Crouch’s books. He has fantastic premises about cutting-edge science and writes fast-paced thrillers that keep you eagerly turning the pages to the end. Crouch has been compared to Michael Crichton, in that they both write grounded techno-thrillers about plausible future technology with high-concept books that are ripe for adaptation to the screen (TV and movies). But despite me loving the premises of Crouch’s two previous books, Upgrade and Recursion, ultimately I didn’t like the books as a whole—or more precisely I was let down by their endings.

Continue reading →

How to Solve NBA Tanking With Relegation

Leave a reply

The NBA has had a tanking problem for a while. Tanking is when teams deliberately try to lose games in order to improve their odds of receiving a top pick in the draft lottery. You can’t really blame teams for tanking, as a top pick is often the best way to attain a potential superstar and improve your roster. Tanking has worked for teams in the past, like the 76ers (Joel Embiid) and Thunder (Durant, Westbrook, Harden), and most recently the Spurs (Victor Wembanyama). The NBA has changed the lottery odds to try to address the tanking issue, but that is not enough. My previous proposal of abolishing the draft would completely solve this problem, but that is something the NBA is unlikely to do anytime soon. Luckily there is another option: relegation.

Continue reading →